翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Street Talk ・ Street Talk (D.I.T.C.) ・ Street Talkin' ・ Street team ・ Street Tech ・ Street theatre ・ Street Thief ・ Street to Nowhere ・ Street Tough ・ Street Trace NYC ・ Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries ・ Street Trash ・ Street Tuff ・ Street TV ・ Street unicycling ・ Street v Mountford ・ Street v. New York ・ Street Value ・ Street Vendors Act, 2014 ・ Street vendors in Mexico City ・ Street warden ・ Street Warrior ・ Street Warriors ・ Street Wars ・ Street Wars (TV series) ・ Street Warz ・ Street Without a King ・ Street Without Joy ・ Street workout ・ Street Ğädel Qutuy Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Street v Mountford ： ウィキペディア英語版 Street v Mountford ''Street v Mountford'' () (UKHL 4 ) is an English land law case from the House of Lords. It set out principles to determine whether someone who occupied a property had a tenancy (i.e. a lease), or only a licence. This mattered for the purpose of statutory tenant rights to a reasonable rent, and had a wider significance as a lease had "proprietary" status and would bind third parties. Lord Templeman held that the defining feature of a lease was exclusive possession, despite the fact that this view had been rejected and heavily criticised in a number of Court of Appeal cases previously, for example in the judgment of Denning LJ in ''Errington v Errington''. ==Facts== On 7 March 1983, Roger Street, a Bournemouth solicitor, gave rooms 5 and 6 in No 5 St Clement’s Gardens, Boscombe to Mrs Wendy Mountford for a ‘licence fee’ of £37 a week, terminable on fourteen days’ notice. Mrs Mountford also signed a form saying she understood the Rent Act 1977 did not apply to regulate her rental payments. The Rent Act 1977 at the time applied to leases only, not licences, and required landlords accept a rent which was deemed fair by an independent officer or tribunal, and also required more than fourteen days’ notice would be given. Mrs Mountford argued that she had a lease. The judge held Mrs Mountford did have a lease, and Mr Street appealed. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Street v Mountford」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.